Attention to detail is critical to delivering polished, well-structured work that aligns with project scopes, brand guidelines, and client expectations. Every detail—grammar, formatting, and overall presentation—must be carefully reviewed to ensure consistency and clarity.
This includes verifying that project timelines match the brief, updating and documenting any changes, and refining formatting for clarity. Tasks should be clearly structured, appropriately timed, and free of unnecessary stacking. Weekly reports and Loom videos must be delivered on schedule, with concise and relevant information.
Scoring for this pillar evaluates how well the project brief, timeline, and deliverables are maintained, alongside client and creative feedback on attention to detail.
Score Calculation
Score Calculation
For each performance pillar, we ask several questions during feedback reviews. You can score up to 10 points for each question. We then calculate the average score for that pillar and multiply it by 10, giving a maximum score of 100 for that pillar in that specific review. All the feedback scores are then averaged to give you the Total Pillar Score, which you see in your portal.
The weight of this score is x1.
Types of reviews where your Attention to Detail skills are rated:
Quality Assurance (QA) Checks
Client Reviews
Creatives Reviews
Attention To Detail: Questions And Points
Attention To Detail: Questions And Points
QA Checks Questions And Points
Does the initially submitted and current scope align?
(+4 points) All the steps in the timeline are the same as in the project brief
(+2 points) The project brief is updated (if applicable)
(+2 points) There are notes explaining any updates made to the brief (if applicable)
BONUS (Pick Two)
(+1 point) Fixed formatting and weird words
(+1 point) Removed bottom section of the template if it's not needed
(+1 point) Extra info was added / updated, comments added and tagged the client
How clearly does the timeline outline the project?
(+1 point) Project phases are clearly outlined
(+1 point) Made sure the “final files” task is renamed and explained and the duration/timing is adjusted
(+2 points) All tasks are adjusted to less than 3 days. If a CD thinks a task will take longer than 3 days, then the task is broken down into smaller tasks
(+2 points) Ensured task or phase names are clearly detailed (e.g., "Concept Ideation (3-4)") when modified, or retain the original name without typos
(+1 point) Tasks aren't stacked needlessly
(+1 point) Tasks statuses are updated (no sirens 🚨)
BONUS (Pick Two)
(+1 point) Placed the client feedback task under the client section without extending the timeline
(+1 point) Placed the CD QA task under the CD section without extending the timeline
(+1 point) Used emojis to enhance communication within timeline tasks
(+1 point) Added client tasks in the client section that could impact the project timeline (e.g., "refer to X examples," "watch video," "provide headshots," etc.)
Client Review Questions
Rate the team's attention to detail
Is the team paying enough attention to detail?
Creatives Review Questions
Were project & brand specs well considered and implemented?
Were things like the timeline & Miro board updated with details?
Were files named?